Member of Parliament for Akuapem North, Sammi Awuku, has cautioned President John Dramani Mahama against any move to extend his presidency beyond the constitutional two-term limit, describing such efforts as a potential political trap.

In a Facebook post on Friday, July 10, 2026, the New Patriotic Party (NPP) lawmaker advised the President to protect his legacy by retiring from active political leadership in 2029.

His comments follow ongoing legal proceedings before the Supreme Court concerning the interpretation of Article 66 of Ghana’s 1992 Constitution, which outlines presidential term limits.

Two separate cases have been filed before the apex court. The first, initiated in January 2026 by the Anchoring Democracy Advocate Movement Ghana (ADAM-GH), seeks a declaration that no individual can be elected President for more than two terms.

The second case, filed by journalist, lawyer and political activist Ken Kuranchie, argues that President Mahama is eligible to contest for a third term.

Reacting to concerns raised by journalist Manasseh Azure Awuni over the matter, Mr. Awuku expressed suspicion that the legal actions could be part of a wider political strategy aimed at damaging President Mahama’s reputation.

"Mr. President, they don’t wish you well. Don’t fall for this trap, and don’t be persuaded to drink a cup of 'poison' prepared by detractors in your own party," Mr. Awuku wrote.

The Akuapem North MP referenced former President Jerry John Rawlings, founder of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), arguing that he did not seek to extend his presidency beyond the constitutional limits.

"Even Rawlings, the founder of your party didn’t embark on this adventure," he stated.

Mr. Awuku further claimed that some individuals within the NDC who are already positioning themselves for the presidency could eventually turn against President Mahama if he pursued another term.

He concluded by urging the President to "Retire in Dignity in 2029," adding that his political career should not end through prolonged political conflict or public demonstrations.

The Supreme Court’s eventual interpretation of Article 66 is expected to clarify the constitutional position on presidential eligibility and term limits.